PDA

View Full Version : Pitchfork sheds the truth on the dot org


Rob
10-10-2006, 03:10 PM
Ryan Adams Message Board Fiasco

Ryan Adams has been known to do some pretty crazy things, like kick hecklers out of shows, leave silly messages on Pitchfork's answering machine, and record bad rap songs. But even though we like to make fun of ol' Ry sometimes (ok, a lot of times), we aren't going to pick on him for something he didn't do.

Last week, the interweb was buzzing with rumors that Adams had demanded the shutdown of the message board on popular fan site RyanAdams.org, a privately-owned site over which Adams had no legal power. Allegedly, Adams and his management sought editorial control over the board's contents.

However, Pitchfork contacted David Smith, proprietor of RyanAdams.org, who set the record straight. "Ryan's management contacted me Tuesday, asking that the board be temporarily shut down," he disclosed. "Initially there were reports of censorship or an inability to deal with criticism and negative show reviews. But I've since had the opportunity to discuss the issue directly with Ryan...and apparently sensitive information of a personal nature had been exposed on the board which was a threat to the band. I won't go into details, but he was (understandably so) quite upset about this.

"I would like to stress that taking the board down was a voluntary action on my part. RyanAdams.org is a privately owned domain name, so I don't see a legal recourse. But out of respect for Ryan, I made the decision to comply with his request.

"I don't see the point of running a 'fan site' for an artist who disapproves of it, so the decision was an attempt at maintaining good relations with Ryan and his management."

Smith went on to explain that Adams' management has not requested any sort of direct editorial control. Instead, its members are interested in instituting technical changes to the webpage, "making it harder to create an account just to cause trouble, and easier to moderate when problems do occur."

Assuming the changes are accepted by both parties, the forum should return in the near future. If an agreement isn't reached, a last resort option is moving the website to disassociate it with Adams, though this "doesn't look likely," according to Smith.Adams and his management offered no comment on the situation.

Since the incident took place, a message intended to "dispel rumors" popped up on RyanAdams.org. One point reads that the incident prompting the shutdown "occurred while the band was in London, and Ryan's hotel room information was posted to the message board. In another incident, personal information about Ryan's parents was posted to the board."

Jeez, people-- you should know by now that pissing off the Adams Family in October is bad news!

In the meantime, RyanAdams.org regulars have moved over to the message board at alt-country.org

.

Kevin McF
10-10-2006, 03:15 PM
you stole that from the originator robert

foggy
10-10-2006, 03:33 PM
Thanks for that, Rob. I was wondering when they would weigh in with something.

Rob
10-10-2006, 03:33 PM
Thanks for that, Rob. I was wondering when they would weigh in with something.
I'm surprised they waited to get the story straight.

foggy
10-10-2006, 03:34 PM
I'm shocked, frankly.

maddiehope
10-10-2006, 03:43 PM
I did notice that they said they "contacted" Dave, but they only seem to be quoting what he posted on the .org.

Rob
10-10-2006, 03:43 PM
I did notice that they said they "contacted" Dave, but they only seem to be quoting what he posted on the .org.
:lol

maddiehope
10-10-2006, 03:44 PM
See, my English degree does come in handy sometimes

:D

sicottem
10-10-2006, 07:22 PM
one of the few not quite negative things they have said about ryan

la twinkle
10-10-2006, 07:45 PM
one of the few not quite negative things they have said about ryanLove that, "not quite" ehh... so true. And yes I'm surprised they waited to get it straight aswell, rob. I thought they would jump on that one asap.

sicottem
10-10-2006, 08:16 PM
they sure did jump on the ryan rap quick....i cant stand it how they always post the rock n roll era pictures of him when he looks like a complete asshole....im not very fond of the pictures of him at that time

Rob
10-10-2006, 08:34 PM
they sure did jump on the ryan rap quick....i cant stand it how they always post the rock n roll era pictures of him when he looks like a complete asshole....im not very fond of the pictures of him at that time
:lol that's the best part that they still do that

foggy
10-10-2006, 08:42 PM
I gotta say that I enjoy that as well. :lol

Sydneyfan
10-14-2006, 04:43 PM
Seems like Rolling Stone aren't buying it though.....


The administrator for the site that hosted the infamous, and often wildly entertaining Ryan Adams message board has explained why the board was shut down. He claims it wasn’t Ryan’s idea, that “sensitive” information like the name of Ryan’s hotel in London, was posted at one time and that freaked everyone out, but when he says, “Ryan and The Cardinals are not interested in censorship,” it sounds to us like somebody got to him.


http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2006/10/13/brandon-flowers-vs-green-day-ryan-adams-not-into-censorship-usher-gets-a-note-from-mom/

radioradi0
10-16-2006, 01:18 AM
How does Pitchfork know which site is the alt-org? Several different urls were offered in the dot org news section, by several mods. That part creeps me out, frankly.

Sydneyfan
10-16-2006, 01:37 AM
How does Pitchfork know which site is the alt-org? Several different urls were offered in the dot org news section, by several mods. That part creeps me out, frankly.

I assume either Dave told them or the disgruntled guy from the org who contacted some media outlets did. They could have also got it from reading other RA boards - it was mentioned numerous times.

radioradi0
10-16-2006, 02:04 AM
None of those ideas console me. Thanks for chiming in, though. :)

I don't see anything nefarious about it. But it's looking like an uphill climb for a return to normalcy, if you know what I mean.

Sydneyfan
10-16-2006, 02:07 AM
None of those ideas console me. Thanks for chiming in, though. :)

I don't see anything nefarious about it. But it's looking like an uphill climb for a return to normalcy, if you know what I mean.

Journalists are going to find information out - that's what they get paid to do at the end of the day.

I'm certainly not privy to the machinations of the .org, but is the idea to somehow keep the new site a secret from the media or merely to distance it a little from the Ryan Adams name? Keeping it a secret is going to be impossible.